| |
|
|
|
Download Chauncey Thomas
Document - Microsoft Word format
CHAUNCEY
THOMAS BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS
Hub March 1877 page 481
Mr. Chauncey Thomas, one of the leading coach-builders of Boston, has
invented and patented what he calls a Cradle-Spring. It resembles the
two halves of an elliptic spring reversed, and is claimed to give a much
easier ride.
Hub
February 1880 page 480
CHAUNCEY
THOMAS, of Boston, Massachusetts, senior member of the firm of Chauncey
Thomas & Co., carriage-builders, and second vice-president of the Carriage-Builders'
National Association, was born in Maxfield, Penobscot Co., Maine, on May
1, 1822, both parents being of Plymouth Colony stock. His early life was
spent on a farm, where he worked during his boyhood, at the same time
making good use of the limited' opportunities for education offered by
a district school, which he attended from the age of five to fifteen,
during the summer and winter terms, studying reading, writing, arithmetic
and geography. In consequence of his giving evidence of mechanical skill,
it was determined by his father that he should learn a trade; and in 1837,
at the age of, fifteen, he was, apprenticed to Messrs. Whiton & Badger,
"chaise-makers," of Bangor, Maine, to learn carriage-part and body making.
Both partners were excellent mechanics, enjoying a well-merited reputation
for thoroughness, and their shop was rich in the traditions of the celebrated
carriage factories of John Raynor and Walter Frost, in Boston, where both
masters and men had received their training. The conditions of his apprenticeship
were to work twelve hours a day for board and clothes, with an occasional
dollar or two on holidays for spending money, and to receive instruction
for one term at the Apprentices' School in Bangor .
In those days, work in carriage shops was
much harder, as well as more varied than at present. Spokes were worked
from rough splits, felloes sawed by hand from the plank, and the jack-plane
was in constant requisition. Very little of the modern science of body-making,
now known as the French or Square Rule, was then understood, and experience
was then chief master of the carriage mechanic. Still, work was conscientiously
done, and the result generally satisfactory to both maker and buyer, which
can not always be said of carriages built with the help of modern appliances.
More or less mystery then hovered over the trade, which was closely guarded
by the initiated, and it was only during the last year of his apprenticeship
that its secrets were cautiously imparted to him.
Mr. Thomas gives the following account
of his success when entrusted for the first time with the construction
of a body. "How well I remember my first chaise body. Times were dull,
and bodies not wanted ; but I persistently requested an opportunity to
show what I could do, and was at last told to go ahead. After sawing and
dressing my stock, I asked a question of one of the journeymen regarding
the framing, but was told rather crustily to find out for myself. This
put me on my mettle, and with eyes wide open I proceeded to work out the
problem. I must confess that I did not feel quite, easy in my mind as
to the result. However, I succeeded beyond my own expectations, and evidently
surprised the bosses as well as the workmen, for from that time forward,
as long as I remained in that shop, I occupied the first place as body-maker."
As the business of Whiton & Badger gradually
drifted into wagon and sleigh making, with increasing hard work and insufficient
pay, Mr. Thomas left their employ in 1843, and devoted the winter of that
year to study in the Apprentices' School in Bangor. In 1845 he removed
to Boston, where: he was engaged by Messrs. Slade & Whiton, then a rising
firm of carriage-builders; to whom he had been recommended by his former
employers. Here, all varieties of carriages were made, to order, and he
was immediately set to work making drawings for customers, and working
patterns for the woodworkers and blacksmiths, and was finally given full
charge of construction.
Concerning this sudden and unexpected
rise in his position Mr, Thomas says: AIt would seem that there must have
been a great lack of competent mechanics in those. days, when one so young
as I should be pushed forward into a place of so much responsibility.
Looking back, I now believe it was altogether in my favor that I learned
my trade in a small place like Bangor, for upon going to Boston I was
all eyes, feeling my ignorance, and filled with ambition to know all there
was to be known. At that time there were many grand old vehicles in Boston,
including C-spring chariots, coaches with hammer cloths, and French caleches.
These filled me with curiosity and delight; I studied them with the utmost
care, sat up nights to make drawings of them and of their parts, and soon
began to plan modifications and improvements, and to make new and original
designs.
I thus acquired the knack and the habit
of putting my ideas into shape on paper, and this early training has ever
since proved valuable to me."
While Mr. Thomas was in the employ of Slade
& Whiton, he met with an accident which resulted in a severe injury to
one of his knees, and disabled him for two years. His disappointment can
readily be understood. He did not lose courage, however, but devoted his
time to studying astronomy, geometry, trigonometry; algebra and surveying,
and this undoubtedly marked the most progressive period in his mental
development, giving him the foundation for that wide and varied information
which to-day marks him as one of the best educated members of the trade.
His taste for drawing led him at the same time to give considerable study
to art matters, and he felt a strong inclination to become an artist;
but on recovering from his disability, he returned to his old trade.
In 1851 an opportunity offered for going
into business in West Newbury, Massachusetts, on his own account. Here
he married in 1854, and returned shortly afterward to Boston, where he
has ever since been in active business as a carriage-builder, having his
ups and downs like the best of his contemporaries,--sometimes poor, often
perplexed, but always coining out of his troubles with an untarnished
name, the same enthusiasm for his trade, and the same faith in his ability
to command success ultimately. In one of Mr. Thomas private letters to
our editor, occurs the following remark, which throws light upon his character:
"I can not forget the struggle for existence which I had before gaining
a firm foothold, but I suppose it was only such as thousands of others
have experience. Still, I take pleasure in thinking that, while I have
often suffered from dealings with others, others have not suffered by
their dealings with me."
His present factory is located at No. 103
Chestnut-street, Boston, and was completed in 1876. The main building
covers an area of 34 by 100 feet, six stories high, and supplied with
steam power and all the, modern improvements, including saws, planers,
elevators, power paint-mills, etc. The firm, consisting of Chauncey Thomas,
L. B. Nichols, and J. C. Thomas, assumed considerable responsibility in
erecting this factory while business was depressed in Boston, but has
never had reason to regret it, as trade has continued good. A specially
is made of heavy work, the classes of carriages chiefly built being landaus,
coaches, coupés, and victorias, all of high grade and nearly all built
to order. From thirty to forty workmen are employed, and four forges are
kept constantly busy.
It will readily be understood that Mr.
Thomas's mechanical taste and training have stood him in good stead. Not
only has he originated many valuable inventions; several of which have
been patented, but he has been able to cater to the best class of Boston
buyers many of whom resemble the aristocracy of London and Paris in frequently
demanding new and original features in their equipages. City builders
understand what such orders mean, and they only can appreciate the difficulty
of being always equal to the occasion.
NOVELTY
AND EXPRESSION IN DESIGN
Lecture by Mr. Chauncey Thomas of Boston.
Hub January 1882. Page 537
Hub February 1882 page 583
Hub March 1882 page 641
[On the evening
of Wednesday, December 7th, the Winter Course of Lectures before the Class
in Carriage Drafting and Construction, at the Metropolitan Museum of Art
Technical School, New-York, was opened by Mr. Chauncey Thomas, the well-known
carriage-builder, of Boston, Massachusetts, who delivered an address on
the subject of " Novelty and Expression in Design," the introductory portion
of which is published below.--ED.]
Mr. CHAIRMAN AND GENTLEMEN: Had not non-professionals
already been called to address you, some of whom were probably as unused
to such tasks as I am, I should hesitate to appear. But as all our knowledge,
of whatever nature, is gathered up bit by bit from practical observers
and experimenters before it can be formulated and used in a scientific
manner; and as our science is not an exact one, but must ever be the reflex
of individual thought, what I shall say to you may not be wholly without
value. Not long ago, in a good-natured contest with a friend who is an
architect, as to whose business was the more arduous, and which demanded
the greater measure of ability, good taste and technical knowledge, he
seemed amazed at my claim that, to be a good carriage-maker, one must
study as hard, work much harder, and possess as great an amount of brains
as to be a good architect. "Why," he exclaimed, "a carriage is but a box
on wheels, and what is a wheel?--nothing but a round thing with a hub
and spokes!" Very well, Mr. Architect; and your structure is nothing but
a box without wheels, and the world itself is but a round ball. If I had
here told my friend that to build the best carriage wheel required more
experience and more careful consideration than that necessary to build
a big block of stores, my offense would have been unpardonable, yet I
would not have been far wrong. Not that the wheelwright need be an intellectual
giant. What I wish to say is that (he modern light carriage wheel is a
marvel of perfection. Forty years ago it was impossible, and its improvement
has received an amount of careful study and watchful experiment to adapt
it to the great work it has to perform, that very few can understand.
It is an embodiment of refined mechanical skill. There is really very
little in common between architecture and carriage designing and construction.
Architecture has a wonderful history. Scores of costly illustrated books
detail all possible forms of structure and ornament ; the experience of
ages is epitomized and ready for use. The architect produces new effects
by new combinations of well-known elements; he deals mainly in straight
lines; he has scope for his originality in grouping, massing, and disposition
of parts. The designer of fine carriage work deals in simple forms, mainly
in curved lines and rounded surfaces. His duties send him into the domain
of pure art, scientific construction and mechanical skill. The faculty
of producing graceful curves of the highest character is not a gift that
all possess, and requires much cultivation. A proficient in mechanical
drawing might not be capable of producing a fine drawing of a carriage;
hence, we are in the habit of saying that a good carriage draftsman must
be an artist. In addition to that he must have a scientific knowledge
of construction, and a large amount of experimental knowledge of the best
methods of the construction of the running gear, and the action of its
parts. The fine carriage is one of the most beautiful forms that art has
ever produced. The body, which is its chief characteristic, must be severely
simple in its outline; no excrescences or purposeless ornamentation can
be tolerated.
It must have the fewest parts possible,
the greatest internal and the least external extension; it must have the
greatest possible strength with the least possible weight; and, most of
all, beauty of form; and it must also have novelty.
It will perhaps occur to you that the carriage
designer, hampered by the conditions just named, would seem to be placed
in a straightjacket, where novelty would be a difficult accomplishment.
But have we not curved lines to deal with? and can we not infinitely vary
the expression of ideas by the use of curved lines? In nature we find
certain persistent forms: the blade of grass, the petal of the flower,
the trunk, the branches, and the limbs of the forest tree. Each has the
same fundamental characteristics as its predecessors, but in all the myriad
products of organic nature, every blade of grass, every flower, every
tree, and every leaf of the forest, has its individual peculiarities;
is both like and unlike its great family connections.
Simplicity of form is no bar to novelty
of expression. If you want an example, you have the best of all in the
human face. Each and every face in the world has the same kind of features,
the same number of prominence and depressions. In the facial outline there
are five prominent parts and four intermediate depressions; yet in the
variations of these few parts, how great the difference! How quickly we
single out any known face from all the others.
Col. T. W. Higginson, when he first recruited
his regiment of colored volunteers, said that they all looked alike to
him. He very soon, however, began to recognize individuality among them,
and eventually came to know each and every one of them. The facial outline
is very far from being the whole face, or showing us all its expressions,
but it is the easiest part to draw, and the only part we can see in outline,
so we will make use of it to illustrate our subject. (Using blackboard.]
Thus we find that every human face, although
nature has made them all on the same plan, is a new edition which differs
from all the others. Thus we have infinite variety of form and expression,
all derived from the variation of the lines of the face. As in nature,
so in art. Take the Coach body, with its single curved outline and curved
belt-rail. With these two elements we can never have done with making
changes. Or the Brougham, with its beautiful Chariot pillar. This is one
of the persistent forms that we are never tired of reproducing. The fame
of the originator of the Chariot pillar should be equal with that of the
designer of the Corinthian capital. It is as expressive as the nose of
a beautiful woman.
The belt-rail, the back-pillar and the
bottom lines are also principal factors in giving character to the body.
The boot, also, although a subordinate part, may be varied much more than
the main portion of the body, and is a fascinating point of attach for
the draftsman. And here let me say to you, who are to be the future masters
of design, never despair of producing original forms; for have we not
seen that nature is always variable enough so that everyone of a million
has individuality enough to be quickly recognizable?
Go to the blackboard and make your drawing
with a fret; hand, and you will be sure to get new results. If you are
not pleased with your work, apply the sponge and try again. When you have
reached a point in your work where you can see no chance for improvement,
you have done all that you can do; for your invention or your perception
of the beautiful call go no further. It may not be as good as another
can do, but it will possess a certain personality which you have imparted
to it. Each designer will have some ideal of beauty which will find expression
in his work. Dr. Mitchell, the noted astronomer of Cincinnati, while mapping
the stars, found that with different assistants an appreciable difference
of time elapsed between noting the star's passage across the transit instrument,
and marking the time of such passage. The phenomenon of a star's passage
is instantaneous, and the time is taken by a touch of the finger; yet,
to ascertain the time taken by each individual to do this slight thing,
the learned professor instituted a long series of experiments to find
what he termed each man's personal equation. We will borrow this expressive
term, and say to you that this "personal equation" gives character to
the life of every individual, to all his acts and doings, to his methods
of business or pleasure, and to nothing more than to the work of his hands.
ALTHOUGH, as we have shown, there is ample
room for originality within certain limits, yet, like the architects,
we adhere with great pertinacity to certain persistent forms; most of
these are quite old; and many of them of English origin. The Coach, the
Chariot, the Cab Phaeton, the Stanhope, the Brougham, etc.,--the elements
of all these old forms enter largely into our modern productions. The
gentleman's Drag and the great army of open Carts we must also credit
to the Englishman. The Englishman seems to have been the one "to originate
new forms, and the Frenchman to refine and beautify them; the English
designer makes bold strokes, is original, but often uncouth and crude,
while the Frenchman is an artist with a keen sense of the beautiful. The
Frenchman's lines are wonderfully fine and expressive, and the completed
carriage seems to have been formed of plastic material, so perfectly is
the ideal of the designer realized; while in many English productions
something seems to have been conceded to the stubbornness of wood and
iron, by which the original conception has been modified.
Among the persistent forms which had a
very long lease of life in New England was the Chaise, immortalized by
Dr. Holmes. I believe the first of these two-wheel vehicles was imported
from England. The famous Curricle was of this form, as well as the Spanish
Volante used in Cuba. I know of no form of carriage body which is susceptible
of such wide variations. At its best the form is very beautiful; but it
may also be quite otherwise. I think it likely that I have, in my younger
days, made fifty sets of patterns for this kind of body.
Builders of Chaises differed very widely
in their styles, and fashion also demanded material changes. Sometimes
the bodies were full and generous in size, with fine sloping front pillars
and plump side panels. Sometimes the sides were shortened to the last
degree, with little straight-up front pillars, concaved at the bottom,
and suggesting, when looked, at from the front, the high cheek-bones and
hollow jaws of a starved savage. Sometimes the lines would be weak, bunchy,
and uncertain in direction, looking exceedingly sorrowful; and sometimes
finely-formed and fair to see. There were also "duster" bodies, and "
fan-tail' bodies, and bodies with straight brackets, and curved-up brackets,
and curved-down brackets; and also box-beaded moldings, and rounded moldings,
and chamfered moldings.
I refer to these bygone matters to show
you how many changes may be rung on one little chime.
Those were the days of unscientific methods.
It might be called the "traditionary period," when venerable and venerated
old patterns, worn and blackened by long use, hung on the wall at the
head of the boss's bench. A few mysterious marks on these old patterns,
and a few set gauges in the till of his tool-chest, told how the body
was to be framed.
Bodies were framed in the olden time. All
joints were by tenon and mortise, and pinned together. Halved joints,
fastened were not then thought to be good work. The most expert were regarded
as prodigies of skill, and were thought to be crammed with valuable secrets.
As boys, we were initiated into the old methods of the "thumb-rule," most
of the boys continuing to, work on the same plan as long as they lived
to work at the bench. Many of the methods were wrong, but they were persistently
followed, as I will illustrate. For instance, all Coach bodies in those
days were flat-sided, and all the fullness of the sides was obtained from
the form of the door-pillars and the top-rail. Cant boards were then unknown,
and in truth not much needed.
It is a mystery to us now how carriages
could have been produced in the olden time, by the old methods, at the
prices which were then obtained. For example, an old gentleman, now 80
years old, who was a salesman in his young days, has told me that he used
to get $125 for a Chaise and harness. " This was in Amesbury. On the old
shops used often to be seen the sign; "Chaise and Harness Maker," and
to sell a Chaise without the harness was like selling a fiddle without
the bow.
These carriages had silver-plated joints
and dasher handles, and silver nuts and side-lights. The harness was also
silver-mounted. When you consider that both the body-maker and the carriage-part
maker , took their stock in the rough plank and cut it out by hand, and
that the wheelwright was simply given a pile of huge splits for spokes,
and a plank from which to saw his felloes, the price named seems to us
quite incredible. I suspect that a solution of the problem would show
that the men worked very hard, worked about fifteen hours a day, and received
very small pay; and that the bosses got very little more than the men.
These pictures of the past, which old men with good memories love to revert
to, are useful in showing us the changes which have taken place in the
past fifty or sixty years; and many suggestive hints are contained in
them.
I do not propose in this short address
to discuss the matter of carriage-parts, which are subordinate parts so
far as the style of the carriage is concerned, although, of course, by
no means subordinate in real importance; for the body and all its belongings,
although the principal feature of the carriage, gives us much less anxious
care and painstaking than the machine on which it is mounted. Volumes
might be written on running gears without exhausting the subject,--even
though the modern patent spring Side-bar Wagons, by which so many fortunes
are being made, were left out altogether. Whoever enters the drafting-room
with any hopes of success must be well grounded in the matter of running
gears and their practical working. I have spoken of the running gears
as being subordinate to the body in giving character and style to the
vehicle; still the proper hanging of the body and the disposition of the
supporting parts has much to do with the good or bad effect of the whole
structure.
None of us are wise enough to foresee what
the future has in store for us. We are always disposed to regard the present
time as about what it should be, and to look upon the past as belonging
to the dark ages. Old fashions look very queer sometimes, we must admit;
but the present styles, which we now admire so much, will shortly give
place to the inevitable change which is soon to come. Changes we must
have all the time, more or less radical; but what they will be, who can
guess?The unexpected always happens, but we must wait and see.
The improvement in American carriage work
has been very great in the past twenty-five years, partly due to our greater
familiarity with foreign models, and also largely due to the increased
wealth of the country and the greater demand for fine work. The next quarter
of a century will probably show us a vast increase in the magnitude of
our business, for the prosperous millions of the next generation will
make good customers. Fashion will no doubt banish many of our most cherished
forms, and demand new ones. Your opportunities, pupils of the Technical
School, are to cater to wants and fancies of these coming millions, and
if you can do so you will be well employed.
Those who have acquired a knowledge of
designing by the slow and unscientific method of self-teaching must ever
labor at a great disadvantage, as compared with those who have the good
fortune to receive the benefits of this thorough course of instruction.
Technical education seems to enlarge the
faculties. During a late visit to a large manufactory of stained glass,
I was admiring the new patterns of stained and cut glass. " Ah," said
the partner, " if the old proprietor were alive to-day, who died ten years
ago, he would not know the business, so great is the improvement." "You
see," he continued, "we used to depend on our old hands for designs, and
we thought them good; but now we have the boys from the Institute of Technology,
and the old men are nowhere!" " This is rather hard on the veterans,"
he added, " but the old men never had the training that the boys are getting
to-day, and must of necessity give way to young blood and good training."
As a sign of the times, clearly showing
how important this matter of scientific training in the technical schools
is regarded by the business community, I may say that the Boston school,
though crowded to its utmost capacity, cannot furnish graduates half fast
enough to fill the situations waiting to receive them. Of course the most
gifted get the best places, and it will be the same with you. The manufacturers
cannot do without you, when you are sufficiently advanced to fill the
places that will be waiting for you.
There are two kinds of copyists that annoy
those who make designs; namely, the servile copyist and the exaggerator.
The former carefully reproduces, as nearly as he can, your new design;
and the other, when he sees it, says to himself, "Aha! I can beat that!
I'll show'em style!" So, if you made fuller lines, he puffs them out still
more, and if you have flatted them he makes them nearly or quite straight,
sometimes making the bottom lines of a Brougham look like a cow-catcher
or a plow.
It is greatly to be hoped that this School
of ours, now so well established, will develop sufficient talent to relieve
us from the necessity of copying foreign designs, by producing designers
of our own, quite as artistic, yet having characteristics peculiar to
ourselves and better adapted to the wants of our citizens; and I confidently
predict that eventually we shall cease to look abroad for novelty in heavy
work.
WE are occasionally greatly aided in producing
novelties by our customers. A gentleman will sometimes come to you who
is possessed of very peculiar notions. He can find nothing to please him,
and so, after getting his ideas as far as possible, you prepare for him
a number of sketches. In such efforts to please a customer one often makes
a decided hit, and something good may come out of it for you, or it may
be such that your customer enjoys a complete monopoly of the new style.
The benefit is, that the demand for something new puts us to the trial.
I am inclined to think that more new things have been brought out in this
way than any other, for with an order from a wealthy and liberal patron
to do our best, we have an excellent opportunity to raise the standard
of our work which we should be short-sighted not to improve.
I would by no means urge you to be always
striving for novelty, for this tendency is easily carried to excess. Of
course, one style, however fine it may be, cannot last long, and we must
continually make changes, but we need not strive for startling effects,
but rather for new beauties, by giving our old forms a new expression.
If it were my place to advise you on what
to concentrate your best energies, I should say, after your geometry and
drafting lessons, then turn to free-hand drawing. Next, I should advise
another course of free-hand drawing, and third, still a little more free-hand
drawing. This might be a habit rather than a study, and need not occupy
much of the time so precious to you in your technical studies; but you
should become perfect masters of the pencil, so that your thoughts may
be expressed with the utmost facility. It is related of Michael Angelo
that when an important work was in contemplation in the Roman capital
a messenger was sent to him asking him to send the authorities a sample
of his drawings, that they might judge of his merits. He seized the pencil,
and with one sweep of his master hand described a circle so true that
the dividers could detect no deviation from a perfect curve. "Show them
that!" he exclaimed, proudly. "This is a sample of my ability."
Some men, who claim to be very practical,
object to taking the time of students to teach them to make pictures.
This is very much like the cry of the old-time farmers against "book larnin'."
I would have you make a picture of every object that you can find time
to draw. Object-drawing trains the hand to do the bidding of the will,
and trains the eye to observe all forms correctly, and to appreciate beauty
in all things. Do this, and your designs will blossom with new beauty;
and you will generally find that the practical man, who dislikes to have
you learn so idle a thing as picture-making, will be very glad to borrow
them from you without credit, thus paying you an unintentional compliment.
I cannot but think that the sending out
of the graduates of this school among the carriage-builders of the country
will have the effect of preventing, to a very great extent, the servile
copying system now so common in our trade. Men who are fully competent
to make good designs scorn to copy each other, and it is only those who
can originate nothing who steal everything. Each large manufactory should
have its own individual styles, and have pride enough to maintain a little
personality in its work by which it may be recognized; and if each of
the large builders should employ really competent draftsmen this result
would be almost sure to follow. This is a consummation devoutly to be
wished for, by which all would be benefited, and many relieved from a
great annoyance.
The future of our business is by no means
discouraging. The country is now on the flood-tide of prosperity, vast
interests are being rapidly developed, and the wealth of the community
is being vastly increased in all sections of the country. Wealth brings
refinement and good taste in due time, and good taste demands fine carriages;
and as nobody wants an article just like his neighbor, we always have
opportunities for making changes.
It lies with you, young gentlemen, to give
us such novelties in the near future, and such fine new styles of such
exquisite beauty and perfection, that American carriages will be sought
for in all parts of the world. (THE END.)
No.
16. Boston Vis-a-Vis.
Made by Chauncey Thomas, Boston, Massachusetts
Hub May 1882
WE
are indebted for this design to Mr. Chauncey Thomas, of Boston. It is
characterized throughout by the latest lines, and canework finish of the
body panels, now beginning to become so popular, is suggested in the sketch,
and can easily be introduced if desired. The back seat has a three-bow
top. The boot is a gracefully shaped drag front, with a shallow cut-under,
but sufficient to allow the front wheels to pass freely under. It is supplied
with large wings which extend to the door-step, to which they are attached.
It is mounted on elliptic and platform springs.
Dimensions.--Length of body on the seat-line,
4 ft. 7 in., and on the point of the arm-rails, 5 ft. 7 in. Door, 22 in.
Height of boot, 16 1/2 in. Width of body,
42 in. on the seat. Boot, 34 in. on the seat. Turn under, 3 in. Wheels,
2 ft. q in. and 3 ft. 7 in. Hubs, 5 1/2 x 8 in. Spokes, 1 1/2 in., 10
and 12. Rims, it in. Tire, 1 1/4 x 5/16 in., steel. Axles, 1 5/16 in.,
steel, Collinge. Springs : front, 38 in. long, g in. open, 5 plates, 1
5/8 in.; back, platform, 40 in. long, 9 in. open, 5 plates, 1 5/8 in.
Cross-spring, 5 plates, curved 4 in.
Finish.--Paint the body panels dark green,
striped black, and fine-lined with light green. Seat-panels, plain ; or
if imitation cane be used, this may be put on with a tube, or use the
imported cloth imitation, pasted on. Paint the gearing to correspond with
the body, using a lighter shade of green. Trimming, dark green cloth.
Mountings, silver.
Plate
No. 78. SEDAN CAB.
Hub January 1885.
The
increasing demand for public cabs is at present stimulating the inventive
genius of many American manufacturers, and the latest novelty in this
line is the one illustrated in the accompanying Fashion Plate, for both
drawing and dimensions of which we are indebted to the inventor and patentee,
Mr. Chauncey Thomas, of Boston, Massachusetts, who is now constructing
a number of cabs of this new and striking pattern.
In this design the driver's-seat is introduced
in front of the body, instead of at the rear as in the Hansom Cab, which
cannot but be considered preferable in many respects, and particularly
because it gives the driver better control of his horses. The entrance
is at the rear, which is another improvement over the Hansom Cab, on the
grounds both of convenience and safety.
The seat for the passengers is divided
into two parts, which are hinged to the sides, and, when let down into
place, form a continuous cross seat-board, allowing the occupants to face
frontward, as in an ordinary Coupé. When the door is opened for entrance
or egress, the two sections of the seat are raised. At this point the
question naturally arises whether the door, when closed, can be considered
a secure rest for the backs of passengers. Mr. Thomas assures us that
there is no danger to be feared from this source, as the door is secured
by three different methods, including a patented device placed near the
bottom of the door, which effectually prevents accidental opening.
The tinted portion on the side of the body
represents a recess, which sets in 2 inches from the molding. The driver's-seat
is brought as close as possible to the body. The center of the body in
front has an upholstered back, the width of the driver's-seat; and the
remaining space on either side, from there to the coupé-pillar, is filled
by a light. The axle is cranked about 10 inches, thus allowing plenty
of space for the settling of the body. The springs rest on a solid bracket
or flap, 5 inches from the top of the axle.
An original device, and, we think, a good
one, is attached to the bottom of the driver's-seat and shafts, for balancing
the body to suit varying loads and in ascending or descending inclines.
This may be briefly described as follows:
The shafts, as will be noticed, are fastened
at the front end of the spring to an elongated shackle extending from
the spring-head. Two iron stays, each forming a prong at the shaft-bar,
are fastened to a spring in front of the shaft-bar. These stays are connected
to a lever, which is fastened to an iron bar running across the body.
The iron bar rests in sockets, which are bolted to the bottom of the body.
The vertical rod on the outside of the body, which operates the cross
or horizontal rod and the levers, has a thread near the bottom end, and
passes through a cylinder, also provided with a thread. Another iron is
fastened to the top of the driver's-seat, forming an eye on the outside,
through which the perpendicular rod passes. By causing the outside rod
to move in an upward direction, the short lever outside of the body follows
the movement of the rod, and turns the cross rod, which, in turn, causes
the short lever on the inside of the boot to make a downward movement.
The iron stays are connected with the lever, and the shaft bars follow
the movement, and press on the shafts. The shafts are held in position
in front by the horse, and in a pivot at the spring, which will result
in causing the body to elevate in front. By the use of this ingenious
contrivance, the body can always be balanced or kept on a level.
For a better illustration of this device, we introduce here a special
cut, wherein A represents the vertical rod; B, the handle; C, the cylinder;
D, the outside short lever; E, the end view of the cross rod; F, the inside
short lever; and G, the stays connecting the shafts with the lever.
Dimensions. Width of body, back, 46 inches.
Width of sunken back, 42 inches; width of boot, 24 inches. Height of wheels,
4 feet 6 inches, without the tire. Depth of rims 1 7/8 inches. Size of
spokes, 1 3/4 inches. Thickness of spokes at square end, 1 1/4 inches.
Number of spokes, 14. Stagger of spokes,1/ 2 inches. Hubs, 6 1/2 inches
diameter. Front bands, 4 1/2 inches. And back, 5 3/4inches, inside diameter.
Length of front bands, 2 1/4 inches. Length of hubs, 8 1/2 inches. Tire,
1 5/8 x 1/2 inches.
The side-springs are 42 inches long, from
out to out, with 3 1/2, inches set over all. Width of steel, 1 3/4 inches.
Number of plates, six, namely : the first three No. 2, and the last three
No. 3 steel. The length of the cross-spring is 44 inches over all, with
6 inches set over all. Width of steel, 1 3/4 inches. Number of plates,
six, namely: the first four No. 2, and the last two No. 3 steel. Axles,
15/8 inches. Track, 5 feet, from out to out.
Finish. Painting of the lower quarters
and door panels, dark blue; and upper quarters, upper doors, recess boot
panel and moldings, black. The moldings are striped with a fine line of
Naples yellow. Running gear, dark blue, with two narrow stripes of Naples
yellow.
Trimming, blue French skins, and blue carpet.
The top is sheathed with cherry. Mountings, brass.
Chauncey
Thomas, Boston, Massachusetts.
Carriage Monthly November 1889 page 238
CHAUNCEY THOMAS, Boston, Massachusetts.--Coach and rockaway side, showing
the Thomas patent open side. This radical improvement in carriages is
thus described: When the sides are thrown open it is a perfect summer
carriage, being completely open to the air, and affording an unobstructed
view on either side while the top is always fit position for shade or
shelter. If the winds are too fresh, the exposed side can be closed, while
the opposite remains open. If it is necessary to completely close the
carriage, it can be done in less than two minutes. All who have used the
landau or landualet need not be reminded how quickly the shrinking leather
top draws the wood-work out of shape, and how constantly the many joints
need repairs. In this new system, the front and rear portion, with the
roof, have the same strength and permanence of any coach or brougham,
thus affording to the movable parts a rigid outer framework, which serves
to keep them all fit exact position.
Novel
Written by a Carriage-builder.
Hub March 1891 page 955
THE CRYSTAL BUTTON.
The
marvelous discoveries and inventions of the last half-century have sent
men's imagination into the future, to shape the material and moral condition
and state of humanity centuries hence. Mr. Chauncey Thomas has done this,
and gives us the result of his imaginative explorations in a striking
story entitled "The Crystal Button."
He reaches forward three thousand years,
and found very wonderful contrivances for the comfort and convenience
of men: air-ships, railway, trains of almost incredible speed, and electricity
so well understood and controlled as to be perfect for light and motive
power, steam obtained from the heat of the sun s rays, hydrogen, procured
from water, as the chief article of fuel, and many other things quite
as remarkable.
The moral atmosphere of the community may
be inferred from, the prevalent influence of the great Order of the Crystal
Button, whose central principle was Ato be true and honest in every act,
word and thought." Naturally, under this principle, character outweighed
wealth or station, monopolies died out, labor questions were gradually
settled, and, in short, peace on earth and good-will among men prevailed.
One great charm of this story is the natural
adjustment of the miraculous achievements to causes which are in operation
now and here. The beneficent result is no prodigy, but the inevitable
outcome of the orderly development and extension of forces with which
we are all more or less acquainted.
HOUGHTON,
MIFFLIN & Co., Publishers. February 1, 1891. 4 Park Street, Boston, Mass.
EDITORIAL NOTES.
Readers
of The Hub are likely to take a special interest in the above-named novel,
for the reason that its author is a carriage builder, and one still in
active service, namely: Mr. Chauncey Thomas, of Boston, Massachusetts
who has occupied a prominent position as one of the leaders of the trade
for upwards of a quarter-century past. So far as we are aware, this is
the first time any carriage-builder has ever disclosed himself to the
public eye as a writer of fiction, but the trade has reason to be proud
of this first manifestation. The scheme of the story forming the nucleus
of "The Crystal Button" is briefly as follows. Paul Prognosis, a skilled
mechanic; while rescuing a workman who has fallen from a bridge, receives
an injury to his brain which, for the succeeding ten years, renders him
oblivious to all persons and things in the material world, although, there
is no external evidence of injury and his general health continues good.
During this period, he lives in an ideal world of fancy, where all mechanical
possibilities that he had previously forecast or even vaguely imagined
appear to be realized. These are described in detail and with a vividness
that compels the sympathy and interest of the reader as he follows the
delighted visitor in excursions through the wonder-city, of Tone. The
carriage builder will no doubt be chiefly interested in the chapters describing
"The Underground Railway," "The Pyramids," AThe Air-Ship," "The Trans-Continental
Railway," "Mount Energy," and AThe Solar Steam-Works," and also in incidental
references to the disuse of horses in all cities and the substitution
of electricity as a motive, force for propelling pleasure vehicles.
As will be observed, the plan of the work
closely resembles that of Mr. Edward Bellamy's "Looking Backward," but
it deals chiefly with mechanical rather than social and economic questions,
and thus serves to, fill out the picture which Mr. Bellamy has so attractively
sketched; and, as explained in the preface, it, was written during the
years 1872-78, long before the production of "Looking Backward,"
The atmosphere of the book throughout is
eminently cheerful and stimulating and we recommend it as well worth careful
study by both workmen and manufacturers who are not averse to being amused
as well as instructed.
The
Story of Inca Rocca.
Hub August 1891.
Is
the title to a volume of poems by Chauncey Thomas, the Boston coach maker,
whose Crystal Button won for him a position among the literati.
The poem is based upon legendary Peruvian
history, told in a charming, easy style, of the first of the Incas, Great
Manco Copac and his life, and how
" This celestial pair, The son and daughter of the sun and moon, Descended
upon Titicaca's isle."
How by peaceful industry a nation grew,
until envy attracted the barbarous neighbors, and how, when all seemed
lost, Inca Rocca beat back the foes, and again restored peace and happiness.
The initial poem is followed by several
short ones, one of which, Lines to My Jack Plane, written in 1858, will
be appreciated by woodworkers. The book is " Dedicated to the memory of
my friend George Houghton."
LINES
TO M Y JACK PLANE.
(WRITTEN IN 1858.)
WELL, Jack, my lad, you're growing old,
You bear the marks of age,
Your story soon will be all told,
But courage, Jack, you long shall hold
A place on memory's page.
You've many a sad mark on your face,
And bruise upon your front;
But in life's crowding, scrambling race,
And ours had been no ambling pace,
We've always borne the brunt.
We have had to rough it, you and I ;
The work that we have done
Hath worn us down a little, Jack,
But those who follow in our track
May glide more smoothly on.
What though in contact with the world,
In pushing on, my lad,
You are so scarred, and bruised and worn
And of your pristine beauty shorn;
Should these thoughts make you sad ?
'Tis only on the surface, Jack,
You're sound and clean at heart;
'Tis but the grosser sort of clay,
That time doth from us wear away ;
He leaves the better part.
Wouldst have thy shining youth again?
Nay, nay, no more would I.
We ask not time to lead us back,
But stoutly marching forward, Jack,
We'll grant to age no sigh.
Then push along, my worthy friend,
While life spins out its thread,
There's little time for rest, or rust,
Until the sentence, " dust to dust "
Is written o'er thy bed.
Chauncey Thomas.
Physician's
Buggy.
Hub September 1892.
B Buggy Y. SCALE, 2 IN. TO THE FOOT.
(See Fashion Plate No. 32.)
For
the design illustrated by Fashion Plate No. 32 together with the description,
we are indebted to Geo. W. McNear, with Chauncey Thomas & Co., of Boston,
Massachusetts.
Although nothing is strikingly new in this
design it is light and pleasing in appearance yet substantial in construction
and is well adapted for the physician's use,
as it is warm and comfortable and there is ample box room for carrying
necessaries. The top is three bow, open, provided with side curtains,
made to knob on. The construction of the body is simple and similar to
that of a Stanhope body. It is suspended on two elliptic springs, and
has a straight drop reach.
Dimensions of Woodwork.--Width of body
on top, 31 2 in.; and at bottom, 30 2 in. Width of seat on top, 41 in.;
and at bottom 35 in. Length of body, 4 ft. 8 2 in. Height of body, 12
in. Height of wheels: front, 44 in.; and rear, 48 in. Depths of rim, 1
1/8 in. Size of spokes, 1 1/8 in. Number of spokes, 14 and 14. Stagger
of spokes, 1/4 in. Front and rear hubs, 3 2 in. diameter, and 6 2 in.
long. Front bands for hubs, 2 1/4 in. diameter and 2 in. long. Back bands
for hubs, 2 7/8 in. diameter, and 7/8 in. long. Distance between wheels,
from center to center of axles, 61 in.
Dimensions of Ironwork.--Front spring,
elliptic, 35 in. long, from center to center, with 7 2 in. opening on
main leaf. Width of steel, 1 1/4 in. Number of leaves, four, namely: Nos.
2,. 3, 4 and 4 steel. Holes apart on top half, 3 2 in. Size of holes,
3/8 in. Rear springs, elliptic, 37 in. long, from center to center, with
8 2 in. opening on main leaf. Width of steel, 1 1/4 in. Number of leaves,
four, namely: Nos. 2, 3, 3 and 4 steel. Perch, 7/8 x 7/8 in., plated with
1/4 in. iron. Axles, front and rear, 15/16 in. Tire, 7/8 in. Track, front
and rear, measured outside to outside on the ground, 4 ft. 8 in.
Diameter of fifth wheel, 12 in. Weight
of vehicle, complete, about 350 lbs.
Painting.--Body, black, with green panels:
Gearing, green, striped with broad lines of black, edged with fine lines
of white or yellow. Trimming.--Green goat skin. Mountings, silver.
Plate
No. 70. Three Spring Stanhope Buggy.
Hub March 1892 page 568.
SCALE, 2 IN. TO THE FOOT.
For
the design and description of Fashion Plate No. 70, we are indebted to
Messrs. Chauncey Thomas & Co., of Boston, Massachusetts It represents
that of a large and roomy buggy. This buggy is suitable for business purposes
or gentlemen's driving. The body should be substantially made. The construction
is similar to that of the ordinary Stanhope phaeton. The body is suspended
on three elliptic springs, the gear having a straight reach. There are
two lights in the rear, namely, one in each back stay, and a center curtain
to roll up. 
Dimensions of Woodwork.--Width of body
on top, 16 2 in. Width of seat on top, 23 2 in.; and at bottom, 20 in.
Length of body, 4 ft. 5,4 in. Height of body, 12 2 in.; ditto seat, 10
2 in. Height of wheels: front, 41 in.; and rear, 47 in. Depths of rim,
1 3/8 in. Size of spokes, 1 3/8 in. Number of spokes, 12 and 14. Stagger
of spokes, 1/4 in. - Front and rear hubs, 4 2 in. diameter, and 7 in.
long. Front bands for hubs, 3 in. diameter, and 2 in. long. Back bands
for hubs, 3 2 in. diameter, and 7/8 in. long. Distance between wheels,
from center to center of axles, 63 in.
Dimensions of Ironwork.--Front spring,
elliptic, 36 in. long, from center to center, with 8 in. opening on main
leaf. Width of steel, 1 3/8 in. Number of leaves, 4, namely : Nos. 2,
2, 3 and 4 steel. Holes apart on top half, 4 in. Size of holes 3/8 in.
Rear springs, elliptic, 38 in. long, from center to center, with 8 2 in.
opening on main leaf. Width of steel, 1 3/8 in. Number of leaves, 4, namely:
Nos. 2, 3, 3 and 4 steel. Perch, 1 1/4 X 1 1/4 in., plated with 5/16 in.
iron. Axles, front and rear, 1 1/8 in. Tire, 1 1/8 in. Track, front and
rear, measured outside to outside on the ground, 4 ft. 8 in.
Diameter of fifth-wheel, 15 in. Weight
of vehicle, complete, about 435 lbs.
Painting.--Body and gearing, green, striped
with two fine lines of yellow.
Trimming.--Green goat skin. Mountings,
silver.
Plate
No. 115. Thomas Trap.
Hub November 1894.
Designed and built by Chauncey Thomas & Co., Boston; Massachusetts.
Scale 2 inch to the foot.
FASHION
Plate No. 115, represents one of the neatest of the many traps put upon
the market; neat in form, compact in appearance, and yet roomy and comfortable.
It is fitted with the now well-known Thomas tilting front seat, which
tips forward the dasher to give access to the rear seats. The back seat
is by a very simple arrangement thrown forward and downward, by pushing
forward the hinged back which falls flat upon the cushion, forming a deck
panel. The operation of the working parts of the front and rear seats
are instaneous and the construction is so simple that there is small chance
of disarrangement or wear.
Dimensions of Woodwork.--Width of body
on top, 41 2 in., and at bottom, 34 3/4 in.
Length of body, 6 ft. 2 in. Height of body,
24 3/4 in. Rocker plates, 2 1/4 x 3/8 in., fastened by No. 18, 1 1/4 in.
screws. Height of wheels: front, 36 in., and rear; 48 in. Depths of rim,
1 1/4 in. Size of spokes, 1 1/4 in. Number of spokes, 12 and 14. Stagger
of spokes, 1/4 in. Front hubs, 4 2 in. diameter, and 7 in. long. Front
bands for front hubs. 3 in. diameter, and 2 in. long. Back bands for front
hubs, 3 1/4 in. diameter, and 3/4 in. long. Rear hubs. 4 2 in. diameter,
and 7 in. long. Front bands for rear hubs, 3 in. diameter, and 2 in. long.
Back bands for rear hubs, 3 2 in. diameter, and 3/4 in. long, Distance
between wheels, from center of axles, 59 in.
Dimensions of Ironwork.--Front springs,
39 in. long, front center to center, with 8 in. opening on main leaf.
Width of steel, 1 2 in. Number of leaves, five, namely: Nos. 2 and 3 steel.
Holes apart on top half, 4 in. Size of holes, 3/8 in. Rear springs, 37
in.. long; front- center to center, with 7 in: opening on main leaf. Width
of steel, 1 3/8 in. Number of leaves.- four, namely: No. 3 steel. Holes
apart on top half, 3 2 in. Size of holes, 3/8 in. Perch, 1 1/4 x 1 1/4
in., plated with 5/16 in. iron. Axles, front and rear, 1 1/8 in. Tire,
1 in. Track, rear, pleasured outside to outside on the ground, 4 ft. 8
in. Track, front, measured outside to outside, 4 ft, 8 in. Diameter of
fifth wheel, 12 in. Weight of vehicle complete, about 375 lbs.
Painting.--Gear, light bronze green; body,
black; slats, light bronze green; and upper panels dark green; stripe
of Malori green.
Trimming.--Gear, light bronze green, striped
with one line of Malori green, and two of black.
Drab Bedford cord on whip cord. Black leather
welts.
Obituary
Chauncey Thomas
Hub November 1898.
Chauncey
Thomas carriage builder of Boston, Massachusetts, died at his residence
at Roxbury on Nov. 8, in the 77th year of his age. Mr. Thomas had been
in poor health for some time but was able to be at the factory nearly
every day up to Saturday, the 5th inst., but the nature of his trouble
(heart disease) made his friends aware of the fact that he was liable
to drop off at any moment. In the death of Mr. Thomas there has passed
away another of the eminent carriage builders of the old school, it skilled
mechanic, a draftsman and designer of more than usual genius and good
taste. A successful manufacturer, a student and a writer, whose works
evidence deep thought; a man of sterling integrity, intelligence and worth.
Unobtrusive but genial, he surrounded himself with friends who will deeply
mourn his loss.
He was born in Maxfield, Maine, on May
1, 1822; his early life was spent on a farm, and his education was such
as he could get at the public schools. In 1887, at the age of 15 years,
he was apprenticed to Whiton & Badgor, "chaise makers," of Bangor, Maine,
to learn the woodwork branch of the business. Owing to business changes
he left the employ of the firm in 1843, and studied one winter in the
Apprentices' School, in Bangor. He moved to Boston in 1845, where he worked
for the firm of Slade & Whiton. His skill soon brought him to the front.
Meeting with an accident which disabled him for two years, he devoted
his time in studying astronomy, geometry, trigonometry, algebra and surveying,
a course of study which laid the foundation for that wide and varied information
which has made him notable as one of the best educated men in the carriage
trade.
He returned to the carriage industry in
1851, going into business for himself in West Newbery, Massachusetts.
In 1854 he moved his business to Boston, where he continued to conduct
it until the time of his death. In a letter to the former editor of THE
HUB Mr. Thomas said: "I cannot forget the struggle for existence which
I had before gaining a foothold, but I suppose it was only such as thousands
of others have experienced. Still I take pleasure in thinking that while
I have often suffered from dealings with others, others have not suffered
by their dealings with me." Mr. Thomas made a close study of the carriage
business and invented many valuable improvements.
He catered to the high grade trade and
maintained a most excellent reputation. He was a prominent member of the
Carriage Builders' National Association and of the Massachusetts Charitable,
Mechanics Association, in which he served as a member of its board of
government.
Death
of Chauncey Thomas.
Hub December 1898 page 620
At
a meeting of the carriage makers of Boston, held on Nov. 10 to take action
on the death of Mr. Chauncey Thomas, the following resolutions were unanimously
adopted:
Whereas our friend and associate has been
taken suddenly from our midst by death, be it resolved,
That in his death we have lost a true friend
and genial companion, whose kind disposition and unassuming manner endeared
him to his immediate associates and made him respected by all who knew
him, a citizen of high character and undoubted integrity, ever ready to
help the needy and uplift the downtrodden.
Be it resolved:
That in his death the carriage trade has
lost one of its brightest and best men, whose genius has done much to
raise carriage making to a high standard as a trade, and for more than
40 years of business career always striving for the best. And although
a business man, yet his writings both in prose and verse show the intellectual
acquirements of the deceased. He took a deep interest in the affairs of
the city and state and country. Be it further resolved: That we extend
to his family our deepest sympathy in the loss of a kind and devoted husband,
a tender and loving father, hoping that even in the sadness of their afflictions
they may find some consolation in knowing that the worth of his private
qualities and the value of his public life are fully appreciated.
Working
Drawing of Curricle Body.
January 1899 Part I of curricle designed by Chauncey Thomas.
Scale, 1 1/4 inch to the foot.
The
drawing given this month is worked out in detail, so as to show comprehensively
the result which will follow, when we obtain the curved surfaces of the
side by this system, these curves are contacted in length parallel to
the side-sweep d, d, Fig. 3, and inclined in their heights parallel to
the turnunder curve a, Fig. 4. Fig. 3 shows the projection in plan, determined
by given conditions, whose length and width are established by the generating
curve of the turnunder and sidesweep. Fig. 2 shows the projection in elevation
and the results which follow the method of first obtaining the points
of width and their trace in plan, generated by the horizontal and vertical
curves of the side. The width which we desire for the body at arm A and
elbow G; Fig. t, is that which determines the curve of the sidesweep,
its contraction and consequently its direction and its position on the
horizontal plane. and when this is complied with, according to the rules,
then the vertical curve is to be considered, the line a, Fig. 4, is projected
upon the vertical plane, according to the contraction of the horizontal
curve, and is determined by this generator, and as mentioned above, that
in order to show it, elaborate drawings are necessary. 
The intention is to make this drawing and
accompanying explanation of value to the body maker, and worthy of his
study, and at the same time comprehensible to the younger members of the
craft. To do this, it is necessary to first explain the first principles
of delineation, as practiced in modern schools of technical training.
The working draft will be better appreciated if the primary conditions
were first understood.
The surface upon which we construct the
drawing is straight horizontally and vertically, a straight line separating
them is their intersection. A point of the side elevation is a given point,
it may be moved in a horizontal or vertical direction to any distance,
every other point in either plane must be stationed diametrically opposite
the point given on the side, a point on the side determines the height
of that point on the vertical plane in the end elevation, and also its
width in either the horizontal or vertical elevations. A surface may be
conceived as traced or generated by a line in motion, a line defines the
limits of that surface, hence it is an edge, it is the angle of the intersection
of two surfaces. A point of projection is that point which determines
the width of that height in either plane; these are the fixed conditions
which exist from principal causes, they are not subject to our will, they
remain fixed, being based upon science and reason.
We first draw the side, Fig. 1. It is the
finished length and height of the body, and since the taste which modern
ideas engender tend to the beautiful in form, side surfaces are curved
in both directions. The wing, pillar B, is the central position from which
the curves radiate; its inclination, in Fig. 4, shows that its top end
must intersect the sidesweep at A; Fig. 3 we make the point, and call
particular attention thereto.
The point which we wish the sidesweep to
touch, the tangent H, is at the heel of the pillar B, in the vertical
line F, Fig. 4, at the point U, Fig. 3. The width of the finished body
to be 48 inches, we, therefore, fix the center 24 inches from the straight
line H. Fig. 3, in a parallel line y, describing a round curve to the
side, the width at the elbow d is fixed at 32 inches, a distance from
center, of 19 inches, and lay down this curve from d, to U, and from U,
cutting d, draw the oblique lint to W, then with P, as center, and G,
as distance, draw the arc M, touching the base xx, and through this point
draw the right line intersecting at W, and where this line cuts the straight
line z, the height of the elbows, Fig. 1, in the point L, Fig. 2, will
be the angle of the turnunder a, a, Figs. 4 and 2. These two points are
then connected with the curve of the side-sweep pattern, and give the
turnunder of the side of the body, the two curves being alike, they correspond
to each other, and also stand at right angles to each other. To prolong
the sidesweep, so that the side surface may be projected from these two
curves, we proceed as follows: Establishing the width of the bottom side
at elbow, at 1 2 inches, from d, to e, Fig. 3, which is parallel to the
center y, in the straight line f, e, the width of the bottomside at toe
is fixed at 1 2 inches, to the point v, and if we draw the horizontal
line v, Fig. 1, from the bottom of toe, to the straight line F, Fig. 4,
and on that line take the distance F, a, and set this out from v, to d,
Fig 3, we, have the point of projection sought, to which we prolong the
sidesweep, in a regular well-turned, curve. The inside of the bottomsides
will then be parallel, the shoulders of the crossbars will be of equal
lengths, and the curves, which are traced on the horizontal planes, thus
projecting from the sidesweep and turnunder, but by a different method
than that which we have been accustomed to follow.
We will first deal with the problem of
developing the curved lengths of the wing pillar and the projection which
its curved edges will cast upon the horizontal plane. To make this pillar
according to the draft, two patterns are required; it cannot be made from
the outlines of the finished side of the body, nor from the turnunder
of the line a, Fig. 4, as the pillar must be lengthened to meet the height
which the two inclinations require. If we take the point A, of the side
and move this to the line a, Fig. 4, and from the point t, as center,
arc this point, to the perpendicular J, and then again across to the side
in the point g, on the straight line A, we will obtain the height of the
side of the pillar, and if we station several points on the curved edge
of this pillar as given upon the line R, and from the points produce vertical
lines, and carry each point across to the curve a, Fig. 4, and arc each
point to its perpendicular, and from this intersection with J, again moved
across to the side intersecting each vertical line as here shown, we will
obtain points through which we pass the trace K, and the height of the
wing pillar at each point, raised according to the inclination of the
turnunder of the pillar, and if we then draw the chain r, from z, at the
bottom to g, at the top, we will have the angle, the height and the size
of the pillar, to which dimensions we then make the pattern for the side
shape of the pillar, hence the line K, and the line r, give the size of
the pattern that will be required to make the finished pillar, as shown
on the side. Evidently, this same method must be applied to the other
position, in order to obtain the pattern for the length and for the curve,
to which we must dress the side surface, in order that the pillar will,
when framed in, and set up, be of the same round as that of the line a,
Fig. 4. If this is not done, then vertical lines must be drawn across
the side of the pillar, as the dotted line from f, to f, Figs. 1 and 3,
and the bevel, in place of a conic bevel, a tool already described and
illustrated in The HUB must be held to those vertical lines while dressing
the side of the pillar to the curve a, hence the line h, Fig. 4, obtained
by vertical lines, similar to those of the side, determine at all points
of height this trace, to which we make the patten, which we lay upon the
back edge of the pillar along the line r, Fig. 4, and mark on the turnunder,
to which we dress the side surface and the pillar will, when carefully
boxed into the bottom side, stand to the right flare, the inside of the
pillar to be dressed from the outside, and boxed into the bottomside its
full thickness, and secured by screws driven in from the inside. Fig.
3 shows the size of the foot of the pillar, and the joint it makes. If
this pillar was dressed to the curve a, and then boxed into the bottom
side, according to that surface, the cross width at the top of the pillar
would be less than the 45 inches required, they would lean in at the top,
a fault by far too common. In order to obtain the length of the second
pattern of the pillar, we take the point 2, as the center, and A as the
distance, and arc this point to its perpendicular height F, in the point
Q. Then will T, as the center and Q, F, as distance, arc to its perpendicular
height J, in the point S, and from this intersection move to g, F, Fig.
4. Then again, with z, as center, g, as distance, arc this point to g,
of the vertical line A, Fig 1, and the height g, g, will give the length
of both patterns, both patterns will be of the same length, but attaining
different heights. This being true, then the turnunder should be carried
to this height, or the turnunder line should stop at the height A, of
the side, we are to understand that the turnunder of the side of the body
is in the vertical direction, as represented in the straight line A, Fig
1, to A, Fig. 3, and not in the oblique direction of the pillar B, Fig.
1.
If we lengthen this pillar, according to
its two inclinations, as shown, in order that it will, when in position,
on the finished body, stand to the height A, of the side, then every given
point will also move to the height K, at which height we take the turnunder,
and not lower down. We take the amount of turnunder at the same height
to which we make the patterns, which are marked on the patterns, and afterwards
transferred to the pillar, and the difference taken at the height arced,
will be the width which we desire the body to have, instead of being narrower
to the amount occasioned by the pillar falling from the vertical, to an
inclined position. Is that the correct and practical method for doing
this work, or is the old and familiar way, termed the "French Rule," a
better method? Suppose, for instance, that the pillar had no turnunder,
as shown in the Fig. 4, but had, say, 1 2 inch inclination in the height,
even then there would be no reason to question the practical sense of
the work. The drawing to the left of Fig. 4 is made to determine this
problem, where the inclination is twice as great and also the amount of
curve, and the points are opposite in both operations and the result is
the same. The gist of the matter is, we take the amount of the turnunder
at a height equal to the arc to which that point is raised, that it may
be, when it falls, of an equal amount; if we take the distance T, to the
point 4, on the line of turnunder a, Fig. 4, and carry this from z, to
4, on the line b, Fig. 1, it will be the point on the pillar B, which
the same point on the turnunder pattern will fall, when applied to the
back edge of the pillar. See the arc from f, to the point 4, of the line
b.
When the point A, of the pillar B, is carried
to the height g, Fig. 1, as we have explained, the arm rail will also
be raised an equal amount, the point G, the elbow remaining stationary,
the joints at both ends of the arm will therefore be changed in their
bevel. We cannot use the lines of the side elevation as originally drawn
from which to set the bevel to mark of the shoulders of either the arm,
or the pillar. The length of the arm-rail is also increased. A drawing
correctly made will determine this. The angle to which we must cut the
shoulder for the half-lap of the arm and pillar is the angle r, n, Fig.
1, and the angle for the back shoulder will be N, and C, the bottom side,
and if we take the point A, Fig. 3, as the center and the distance d,
the elbows, and arc these points to K, thence vertically to the point
K, of the elbow, Fig. 1, the projection required for the length of the
arm, the shoulder will be inside of this, the thickness of the bottom
side, 1 5/8 inches, by this means we may cut the framing in the vise.
A pattern must be made for the arm-rails, which is here enlarged slightly,
by the increased length of both the side-sweep and the side inclination,
this explanation so far describes the drawing, the principle of delineation,
the projection of a point, the trace of a line and the construction and
limits of a surface, but it does not explain the reason, the cause, or
the principle. We have now to deal with a framing piece, that is neither
inclined nor contracted from the vertical or horizontal planes, its inside
surface is parallel, hence a framing piece cannot be oblique in either
plane, when one of its sides is perpendicular, and in dealing with the
projection of the curved exterior surface of the side, we operate exclusively
with the side, and since the other three sides are parallel, perpendicular,
or square, the comprehension of the projection and of executing the work
is simplified.
If we trace the curve c, of the exterior
edge of the bottomside in plan, according to the "French Rule" of projection,
as taught by Brice Thomas, and other eminent draftsmen, we must then be
satisfied with common and expressionless results, in nowise imitative
of the curve c, of this edge as designed in the side elevation, which
is the outcome of study and practical application.
The back view, Fig. 2, shows this line
carefully projected in its vertical elevation, as derived from, first
the side; second, the plan. If we take x, and F, Fig. 2, as the center,
and describe the arc O, from L to E, or to the base x, x, it will give
the distance which the oblique line J, will extend, whose points are d,
the elbow, Fig. 3, and the intersection H, F, through which it must pass.
To make the matter clear we will simplify the explanation by taking a
single point of projection and follow this to an ultimate resultant, if
we first draw the horizontal chain, 3, across both side and back elevations,
we will fix in both planes the given height upon which we wish to develop
one point of many that are necessary to establish the trace C, of the
exterior edge of the bottom side in plan, Fig. 3, and afterwards its projection
in elevation. Having produced this line, as shown in conspicuous position,
first let fall the vertical chain from its intersection with the turnunder
a, Fig. 2, to the tangent H, then with H, F, as the center, describe the
arc connecting the point 3, with the straight line F, then with E, as
vertex, and the arc 3, as angle, draw the oblique line 3, prolonged indefinitely.
Second, let fall the vertical chain from the intersection of C, the bottom
side and the 3 Of Fig, 1, through to the center line y, Fig. 3, and where
this line cuts the side sweep d, d, draw the horizontal line 3, intersecting
the oblique line J, Fig. 5, and where this line meets draw the vertical
chain 3, intersecting the oblique line 3, from E, to I, Fig. 5, and the
distance, 3, 3, defines the turnunder and the projection of that point
in the plan 9, 3, of the bottomside C, Fig. 3, and if we draw the curve
I, from this intersection to the point f, and g, of the wing pillar B,
Fig. 3, it will give the bevel of the bottomside and surface of the pillar,
to which they much be dressed to turn regularly with the sidesweep and
turnunder of the side surface of the body, and at their respective height.
This line I, is made with the sidesweep pattern, which is turned, as it
approaches the elbow, to a rounder curve, consequently in making this
sweep I, we shift the pattern slightly ahead, so as to bring the curve
on the face of the wing pillar parallel to the side sweep. This is therefore
an important line; it is also important to explain the method of finding
its correct points of projection, it is more important to comprehend its
import and its usefulness, and it is conclusive that if we draw from each
given point of the side, vertically to the exterior edge of the bottom-ides,
a like point, and also from the wing pillar, and thus connect the points
with the curve of the sidesweep, the bevel to which we dress the outside
surface of the bottomside is then obtained, in the plan, and in no other
plane of projection. Then, if we measure in from the tangent H, on the
vertical line 3, to the point 9, C, and carry this obtained amount to
the vertical line F, and at the height 3, Fig. 2, and set in this to the
trace c, it will be one point through which we pass the trace of the exterior
edge of the bottom side as shown in the back elevation of the body, Fig.
2.
The dihedral angle, to which the pillar
is dressed, is the angle s, b, obtained by first squaring the line b,
of the pillar, to obtain the dotted line R, to xx, then taken the turnunder
h, A, Fig. 3, and from R, describe arc m, and from m, to A, draw dotted
line s. This is well to know, because the back edge of the pillar must
be beveled, before the pattern can be laid on and marked off to shape.
Many lines are shown on the drawing that do not appear on the shop draft,
but these lines serve to show in detail the principles involved. The drawings
contain all that would be required on a shop draft and more, the object
being to make the draft and its explanation worthy of study.
Working
Drawing of Curricle.
March 1899.
Scale, 3/4 in. to the foot.
Our
working drawing, Fig. 1, illustrates a new suspension for a gig or curricle
of eastern design. It is the invention of the late Chauncey Thomas, and
patented by him. Different styles of bodies can be mounted on the gear,
either with or without top. It can be constructed either heavy or light,
for one or two horses. High wheels can be employed when a massive design
is desired and lighter ones when a smaller vehicle is preferred. It makes
an elegant equipage for a lady who is fond of driving; with rubber tires
it would be noiseless and free from vibration, one of the important qualities
in two wheel work. From an artistic point of view it is when fully equipped
and on the street, attractive and very smart.
Fig. 1, represents the side elevation,
drawn to a scale of 3/4 inch, which gives the reader an idea of its construction
and its dimensions of length and height. The body is hung on leather thorough
braces at 32 inches from the floor, and 9 inches above the top of the
axle turned crossbars at each end of the bent thills (so called from their
apparent continuation of the shafts), take the thorough braces inside
the thills, which pass under the axle, and thus take the steel springs
which are clipped to the top of the axle, the front end of the springs
being three inches longer than the back end, the whole length being 38
inches long by 1 3/4 inches wide, four plates, and shackled at the back
end. The dimensions of the wheels, their track, and length and size of
the axle are taken from the draft, as may be ascertained by measuring
with the dividers, but for convenience we will specify the correct size
of the important stock entering the construction of the gig, which must
be understood carries two riders on a single axle instead of two as in
a four wheel phaeton, and for this reason the stock must be heavier: Height
of wheel, 46 inches, fourteen spokes 1 2 by 1 1/8 in.; hub 7 by 5 2 in.,
front band 4 1/4 by 2 inches, back band, 5 by 7/8 in., 1 1/4 in. Collinge
axle, tire 1 1/4 by 3/8 in., rims 1 3/8 deep, 1 3/8 wide, track 4 feet
8 inch outside, swing of wheel 2 3/4 inches, which with a dish of 3/4
inch will give with a 1 2 inch spoke, a plumb face, all of which can be
ascertained by measuring the draft. The height of the top at the middle
bow is 3 feet 7 inches, length of top from front to back bow on a straight
line 52 inches, width of front bow outside 49 inches; here it is exactly
48 inches, but it should be a trifle wider on each side than the arms,
so as to appear to the eye as of equal width; middle bow 46 inches, back
bow 42 inches, size of stock for front bow 2 by 1 2 in., middle bow 1
1/4 by 1 1/8 in., back bow 4 by 1 2 in., a piece being afterwards glued
on to obtain the correct shape and size which is necessary to fill the
angle which it makes first with the back, second with the side, third
with the top. Unless this trifling expense is submitted to, an expensive
top will be damaged at this particular corner. The shafts are 7 feet 8
inches long, 2 1/4 by 1 2 in. not plated, their height is 43 inches at
the tug stop and are framed together with cross bar, so as to stiffen
the gear. The whiffletree is placed on the top of the cross bar. The shafts
are fixed rigidly to the thills as shown, but in crating they can be made
to shift in a more convenient manner, but the idea is that the balance
should be so perfect as to have no weight at the tug; but should pull
a trifle up, and if the wheel is placed as here shown, that is, 4 2 inches
ahead of the bow hinge, the carriage will, when weighted, balance correctly,
and when this is accomplished the horse motion will be obviated, that
is to say, the shaft will play up and down at the tug, instead of moving
up and down with the horse.
In the January number of The Hub there
is a working draft of the body of this carriage, to a larger and more
complete scale than can be used here, owing to the lengths of the shaft
which we desire to show on the draft. The object is to give a complete
four plate drawing so that the workman can be started in the right direction
toward building the gig and will see just what he has to have bent to
form, in order to move the work along satisfactorily, for if we want a
carriage like this the drawing will assist the workman in making the full
size draft, though he may desire to use a different style of body with
a different top or without the top. In any case the gear will be the principal
part of the work, so far as design goes, almost any style of body is suitable.
The writer has seen several types running in Boston and vicinity.
In this drawing the front and back bows
are of the same height and length, and in making the top in this way we
follow the English instead of the American method of doing the work; as
will be seen the appearance of the side of the top is more equally balanced,
while the crown is much rounder than usual, the amount of which is 7 inches.
The wings are bolted to the arm rails instead of the front bow, and for
the reason that if bolted to the bow they will, when the top is up, carry
their weight ahead of axle, and when down, will carry back of the axle,
thus constantly shirting from one to the other, which is a matter of some
twelve pounds. Now if the wings weigh twelve pounds, and we bolt them
to the front bow, and then balance the body on the axle, with the top
up, the twelve pounds will balance correctly, but if we lower the top,
we carry this twelve pounds back of the axle, and in doing so take twelve
pounds from the front of the axle, making a difference of twenty-four
pounds in the two positions, a weight which could never be calculated
for. On this account we prefer to bolt them in a position where there
can be no such shifting of weights. A perfectly balanced body insures
comfort to the rider, consequently a satisfied customer hence in order
to obtain a thoroughly balanced vehicle, the top should be set and ironed
while in the smith shop. All cushions and the back should be added, the
springs should be clipped to the axle, the shafts bolted to the thills;
band iron straps should be used to hang off the body instead of the leather
thorough brace; the two ends of the side springs should then be secured
to the bent thills with thumb screws, so as to shift one way or the other,
until a balance is obtained, and then bolt the shackles to their proper
places, and in no other way can a satisfactory job be secured.
Figs. 2, 3, and 4 show the width of all
parts, and give the information needed in building the carriage.
Obituary
Chauncey Thomas
Carriage Monthly December 1898.
Chauncey Thomas is
dead. The older carriage builders of America do not need to be told who
and what he was, and where he stood as a carriage builder, a citizen and
a man. The younger race of carriage builders know of Chauncey Thomas,
have heard of him as one of those bright and shining lights who, for more
than a generation, stood in the van of improvement and progress and art
and originality and enterprise. He died at the venerable age of seventy-six,
at his home in Roxboro, Boston, Massachusetts, on November 8th, revered
by the community and honored by craftsmen. Mr. Thomas ranked with John
W. Britton, Charles P. Kimball and men of that stamp and class. He was
one of the founders of the C. B. N. A., and helped by his wise councils
to make it what it is. As a mechanic, he stood at the head. He was born
in Howland, Maine, and learned his trade of carriage builder in Bangor,
Maine. He first entered the carriage business at West Newbury, Massachusetts,
in 1852. He came to Boston, in 1859, and had been continuously in business
ever since. The present firm of Chauncey Thomas & Co. was established
in 1876, with L. B. Nichols and J. C. Thomas as partners. J. C. Thomas
retired from the firm in January, 1892. For nearly forty years their carriage
works stood at the foot of Chestnut street, and they became known as the
originators of the finest carriage styles on the continent. He aimed all
his life to produce the best. His inventions are known to carriage builders,
and his improvements became the common property of the craft. When, some
years ago, it was decided to bring out the work entitled: "One Hundred
Years of American Commerce," with Chauncey Depew as editor, Chauncey Thomas
was selected to write an article on the development of the carriage industry
in this country, which he did, and which has since stood as a piece of
literary work and an example of historical breadth and exactness which,
perhaps, has no equal in its field. To write a deserving notice of the
life and life's work of this talented man would require the work of a
biographer and the contents of a book. He came upon the scene when carriage
building was a crude industry; when art, originality, taste, skill were
all at a low ebb. To him, as to his associates of those early days, belongs
the credit of evolving the carriage, not by way of imitation, but on lines
of originality and breadth, which laid the foundation of the perfect work
of to-day.
Mr. Thomas in social life was most genial,
ever the same agreeable, pleasant man, always looking on the bright side
of life and spreading sunshine wherever he went, and always brightening
his own home and fireside with the same sunshine.
He was unconsciously a pattern to other
men. His goodness of heart was innate, not assumed for show or effect.
He was born with the elements of a forceful character, and throughout
his entire life he developed force, and made it felt in all things with
which he had to do.
The funeral took place November 11th, at
2 P.M., and was largely attended by the local carriage builders, who met
in special meeting to arrange for united
attendance. They passed appropriate resolutions. The pallbearers at the
funeral were: John A. Scott, J. P. Emond, H. C. Seers and Alfred Becknels.
The employees of the firm attended in a
body. Floral offerings were made in profusion.
There was singing by a professional quartet.
The CARRIAGE MONTHLY was represented by W. W. Wood.
Mr. Thomas was not only a carriage builder,
but he was a man. He was a deep and close reader and thinker, and, withal,
a poet of no mean ability. He has left behind him two evidences of his
literary ability-one "The Crystal Button," and the other a volume of poems
of 118 duodecimo pages, published in 1891 in Boston. Among these poems
we select one which, by the way, was, read or recited at his funeral service,
and is entitled "Lines to My Jack Plane." It was written in 1852, when
Mr. Thomas was a mechanic at the bench. There is a sweet and poetic vein
running through these lines which shows his genius was not confined to
his craft alone. The words are as follows:...
As a final paragraph in this insufficient
tribute to the memory of one of our great and good men in our craft, we
make room for the resolutions passed by his associates. BOSTON, November
10, 1898.
At a meeting of the Carriage Makers of
Boston, held to-day, to take action on the death of Chauncey Thomas, the
following resolutions were unanimously adopted:
"WHEREAS, Our friend and associate has
been taken suddenly from our midst by death, be it
"Resolved, That in his death we have lost
a true friend and genial companion, whose kind disposition and unassuming
manner endeared him to his immediate associates and made him respected
by all who knew him, a citizen of high character and undoubted integrity,
ever ready to help the needy and uplift the down trodden. Be it
"Resolved, That in his death the carriage
trade has lost one of its brightest and best men, whose genius has done
much to raise carriage making to a high standard as a trade; and, for
more than forty years of business career always thriving for the best.
And, although a business men, yet his writings both in prose and verse
show the intellectual acquirements of the deceased. He took a deep interest
in the affairs of the city, state, and country. Be it further
"Resolved, That we extend to his family
our deepest sympathy in the loss of a kind and devoted husband, a tender
and loving father; hoping, that even in the sadness of their afflictions
they may find some consolation in knowing that the worth of his private
qualities and the value of his public life are fully appreciated."
Celebrates Fifty
Years in the Trade.
Carriage Monthly July 1911 page 42.
Leonard
B. Nichols, president and treasurer of the carriage and automobile building
firm of Chauncey Thomas & Co., Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, recently observed
the fiftieth anniversary of his entrance into the business. He first began
as a carriage painter in the shop of J. P. Emond, of Roxbury. This gentleman
is still alive, and together with his wife, was the guest of Mr. Nichols
and his family on the occasion of the anniversary. They enjoyed an automobile
ride and had dinner at Mansfield.
Mr. Nichols is sixty-eight years old and
was born in West Newbury, Massachusetts. After learning his trade he entered
the employ of Mr. Thomas as a foreman painter on February 5, 1865. In
1876 he was admitted to the firm as a partner and when Mr. Thomas died
in 1898 and the business was incorporated, he assumed the offices that
he has filled ever since. He lives at 73 Coolidge Street, Brookline. His
family consists of his wife and two daughters, Miss Berta Nichols, well
known as a violinist, and Mrs. Frank P. Rhoades, of Braintree.
As a boy Mr. Nichols passed much of his
time in the village post office and from hearing the usual country arguments
on politics he became a staunch Republican. His first vote was cast in
the second election of Abraham Lincoln, and he has voted for every president
since then with the exception of Grover Cleveland.
Since he cast his lot with the corporation
of which he is now president, Mr. Nichols has seen many changes in the
business. His house was the first to introduce rubber tires for vehicles
in Boston and what was probably the first automobile ever built in that
section was turned out of the shops more than twenty-five years ago. It
was an electrically propelled machine, built to the order of a customer.
Patents:
| C.
THOMAS |
THILL
COUPLING |
100,951
|
03/15/1870
|
| C.
THOMAS |
AXLE
NUT & AXLE |
104,901
|
06/28/1870 |
| C.
THOMAS |
CARRIAGE |
110,606 |
12/27/1870 |
| C.
THOMAS |
BODY |
111,491 |
01/31/1871 |
| C.
THOMAS |
VEHICLE
|
111,492 |
01/31/1871 |
| C.
THOMAS |
CARRIAGE |
113,705
|
04/04/1871
|
| CHAUNCEY
THOMAS |
LANDAU |
160,039 |
02/23/1875 |
| CHAUNCEY
THOMAS |
CARRIAGE |
168,430 |
10/05/1875 |
| CHAUNCEY
THOMAS |
CART
TWO WHEELED |
249,730
|
11/15/1881
|
| CHAUNCEY
THOMAS |
DOOR
CAB HANSOM OPERATING |
328,731
|
10/20/1885
|
| CHAUNCEY
THOMAS |
COACH |
369,370 |
09/06/1887 |
| CHAUNCEY
THOMAS |
TRAP
|
393,937
|
12/04/1888 |
| CHAUNCEY
THOMAS |
LANDAU
& LANDAULET |
405,723 |
6/25/1889 |
| CHAUNCEY
THOMAS |
CART
TWO WHEELED |
467,962
|
2/02/1892 |
| CHAUNCEY
THOMAS |
BUCKBOARD |
499,057
|
06/06/1893 |
| CHAUNCEY
THOMAS |
SPRING
CART |
D22,814 |
09/26/1893 |
|